Using the SWOT analysis, analyse the three job offers by comparing and contrasting each element.
ASSIGNMENT QUESTION (500 Words)
You have just graduated from the university with flying colours and to your surprise you immediately receive three very interesting job offers. However you are faced with a difficult decision to choose which job offers to accept. The followings are the criteria that you have identified for each job offer.
Company/ Offer | A | B | C |
Salary | High | Medium | Low |
Annual Leave | 26 days | 30 days | 24 days |
Allowance | Included | Not included | Included |
Overtime Claim | Not allowed | Allowed | Not Allowed |
Medical Benefit | Included | Not Included | Included |
Distance | Very far – 35km | Near -10km | Far – 25km |
Suitability of Qualification | Very related | Slightly related | Averagely related |
Nature of job | Slightly interesting | Very interesting | Not so interesting |
Opportunity to advance | Medium | Low | High |
Stability | Not Stable | Very Stable | Quite Stable |
Using the SWOT analysis, analyse the three job offers by comparing and contrasting each element. Discuss thoroughly the rational for your choice. You may use any diagrams that you feel suitable to explain your decision making process.
LAMPIRAN / ATTACHMENT
RUBRIK TUGASAN / ASSIGNMENT RUBRICS
KOD KURSUS/COURSE CODE: SBFS1103
SEMESTER: SEPTEMBER 2012
Low | Fair | Above average | Excellent | ||||
Criteria | Marks | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Max Marks |
Weight | |||||||
1. Introduction and overview of the assignment | 1 | No attempt in writing the introduction | Fair introduction;There is no main idea and the different parts of the report not mentioned. | Moderate introduction; main idea is briefly stated, very brief explanation on each part of the report. | Good introduction; main idea is clearly stated, clear explanation on each part of the report. | Excellent introduction; main idea is clearly stated, very clear direction and explanation of each part of the report. | 4 |
2. Comparison of the 3 job offers | 3 | Not available | Brief analysis on the 3 jobs, only a few elements are compared. | Fairly clear analysis on the 3 jobs, some of the elements are compared extensively. | Satisfactorily clear analysis on the 3 jobs, almost all the elements are compared extensively. | Very clear analysis on the 3 jobs, all the elements are compared extensively. | 12 |
3. Rational in the Decision Making Process | 3 | Not available | Vague discussion on the reasons for the decision making process. | The writing is arranged logically, occasionally ideas do not link each other. | Ideas are arranged logically and analysed critical in the decision making process. They are usually clearly linked to each other. | Ideas are arranged logically and analysed critical in the decision making process. They flow smoothly from one to another and are clearly linked to each other. | 12 |
4. Conclusion | 2 | No conclusion | Fair conclusion; main idea was not restated and only some points was discussed. | Moderate conclusion; main idea was partially mentioned and only some points from each section was discussed, some suggestions given. | Good conclusion; main idea was briefly restated and all points from each section was discussed, good suggestions given. | Very good conclusion; main idea restated and all points from each section were thoroughly discussed, excellent suggestions given. | 8 |
5. References & APA style | 1 | No citations & referencing | No citations in text. Only a few references adhered to the APA style. | Some citations were not reflected in the bibliography, only some references adhered to the APA style. | Most of the citations and referencing adheres to the APA style. | All citations and referencing adheres to the APA style. | 4 |
Total Points | 40 |
