For your supplementary assessment, you are required to investigate the issues surrounding theethical handling of information on mobile phones.You should focus on these two in your reflection (which you can write in essay form or withsubtitles):1. Write a critique explaining how the common good is challenged or negated by thisissue locally and globally (approximately 400 words).2. Propose two or three ways to address the challenge as an advocate in order toachieve a more just society (approximately 800 words).In your answer, you will need to demonstrate your understanding of the Common Good and itsrelationship to other CST principles, such as Human Dignity.NB: You are not required to make reference to all CST principles; 3-5 CST principles will besufficient.Readings.According to recent press reports, Apple has refused to release information stored on its iCloudservers despite repeated requests from police, who seek information on suspected criminalswho refuse to reveal their pass codes to their iPhone; and in some cases, on members of knowncriminal networks. The police believe that Apple has information that could help themsignificantly in their investigations of criminal activity, including terrorism and child abuse.They claim that Apple’s refusal to give them the requested information has not helped theprogress of their investigations at all – which are aimed at identifying, for example, the victimswho have been subjected to unlawful, and unethical, sexual “contact” and radicalisation.The police argue that encrypted information should never be used to shield or provide safetyand security to violent or dangerous criminals. Companies like Apple, they believe, should feelobliged to assist with police investigations of crimes especially concerning child-abuse andterrorism, so that justice may be served to those who are guilty of these crimes.Due date:Length and/or format:Referencing:How to submit:Thursday 29th July 2021, 5pm1200 words.You should provide full and correct references in youressay using the referencing system used by your disciplinearea.The Paper must be submitted via Turnitin as a MSWord document. Go to the UNCC300 Supplementary Unitin LEO.Who can you talk to for advice if you have any questions: [email protected] Return of assignment:Assessments will be returned within 2 weeks of thesubmission date. UNCC300 – SUPPLEMENTARY ASSESSMENTMarking rubric HD85-100Di75-84Cr65-74Pa50-64NN0-49Part 1(10 marks)Provides anexceptionallyclear andcoherent critiqueexplaining howthe CommonGood ischallenged ornegated by thisissue locally andgloballyProvides a veryclear andcoherent critiqueexplaining howthe CommonGood ischallenged ornegated by thisissue locally andgloballyProvides a clearand coherentcritiqueexplaining howthe CommonGood ischallenged ornegated by thisissue locally andgloballyProvides alargely clearand coherentcritiqueexplaining howthe CommonGood ischallenged ornegated by thisissue locallyand globally.Fails to providea clear andcoherentcritiqueexplaining howthe CommonGood ischallenged ornegated by thisissue locallyand globally.Part 2(30 marks)Provides 2 or 3ways withexemplary clarityand coherence toaddress thechallenge as anadvocate in orderto achieve a morejust societyProvides 2 or 3very clear andcoherent waysto address thechallenge as anadvocate inorder to achievea more justsocietyProvides 2 or 3clear andcoherent ways toaddress thechallenge as anadvocate inorder to achievea more justsocietyProvides 2 or 3largely clearand coherentways toaddress thechallenge as anadvocate inorder to achievea more justsocietyFails to provide2 or 3satisfactoryways to addressthe challenge asan advocate inorder to achievea more justsociety SatisfactoryUnsatisfactoryStyle and WritingMechanics(5 marks)The writing style is clear.Few errors in grammar, punctuation,and spelling.The writing style is difficult to read andunclear.Many errors in grammar, punctuation,and spellingReferencing(5 marks)Sources are cited accurately.The referencing is generallyconsistent or appropriate.Not all sources are cited accurately.The referencing is inadequate (orentirely lacking).
