TORTS AND COMPENSATION. DOBBS AND HAYDEN 7TH EDITION chapter 19 sections 2&3.
Which one of the following is the best statement of the traditional rule for emotional harm as parasitic damages? | ||||||||
|
Which one of the following statements best describes the “impact rule” as it applies to negligent infliction of emotional distress? | ||||||||
|
Which one of the following statements best describes the “risk of impact—zone of danger” rule as it applies to negligent infliction of emotional distress? | ||||||||
|
The rule that general notions of foreseeability should govern whether a duty to avoid negligently inflicted emotional distress is owed to a bystander plaintiff | ||||||||
|
When one spouse is injured in a way that tends to diminish the ability of the other spouse to take pleasure in each other’s company and that other spouse seeks recovery, the best chance for recovery is a claim for | ||||||||
|
When a plaintiff suffers emotional distress caused by negligent damage to personal property, she will succeed in obtaining recover by stating a claim for | ||||||||
|
According to the Potter v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. case, a plaintiff can collect damages for fear of developing cancer in the future | ||||||||
|
