sustainability of foods in india (pick any one food to work on)

strictly 4000 words(no exceeding)
journal article for an academic audience
use only primary source for reference(no websites)

harvard

MSc. Nutrition

Assessment brief:

Module Title	Food Systems and Policy
Assessment Title	Journal article
Individual/Group	Individual
Weighting	60%
Latest Hand in Date	6th May 2016
Learning Outcomes Assessed	1,2,3,4

 

Assignment 2- Journal Article

You are required to write a Journal Article (discussion paper) which demonstrates a critical evaluation of any contemporary aspect of relevance to food systems and policy. Further detail regarding the format will be provided during the module sessions.

The discussion paper should include the following:

• Background and understanding of the topic and the selected issue (definitions, historical development literature and current arguments.)
• Critical justification of the importance and impact of the selected issue on the various stakeholders involved
• Critical analysis and evaluation of the chosen issue and its influence in and impact on the food chain and nutrition
• Possible responses and appropriate theoretical ideas/frameworks/policies to arrive at a conclusion and recommendations if appropriate.

 

Assessment Learning Outcomes achieved

The extent to which you are able to demonstrate the ability to:-

1. Evaluate safety and threats in a variety of food system environments
2. Critically analyse the theoretical principles of food systems and processing techniques across the food chain
3. Critically examine theory and practice of UK, European and International legislation and food policy
4. Evaluate the main drivers of change and future trends in food systems

 

Course Title:	MSc Nutrition in Practice
Module Title:	Food Systems and Policy	Level:	7
Assessment Title:	Journal ArticleJournal article	Weighted:	60%

 

Criteria and Weighting		Mark	Comment/feedback
Discussion paper presented shows detailed comprehension and knowledge of the background and a clear understanding of the topic and  selected issue (definitions, historical development literature and current arguments)	20%
Critical justification of the importance and impact of selected issue on the various stakeholders involved. Shows the ability to put forward an argument and question different views using appropriate literature	25%
Critical analysis and evaluation of the chosen issue and its influence and impact on the food systems and policy is clearly identified and supported	30%
Possible responses and appropriate theoretical ideas/frameworks/policies to arrive at a conclusion and recommendations which are evidenced with clear and innovative conclusions being put forward	20%
Follows specified format and style required by the journal	5%