ST. Anselm’s Arguments Are Not Based On Empirical Evidence Essay Example

The existence of God occurs as one of the most widely coveted topics that have generated intense debate across various settings all around the globe. In fact, God’s existence has and continues to boggle various individuals drawn from various religions including Islam, Christianity, and Hinduism. Across various religious doctrines, God is perceived to be all-powerful being with immense and unconceivable “might.” Across all the religions God occurs as the principle subject that is often preached, worshipped and discussed. According to St. Anselm, the existence of an all-powerful being is a conception of the mind. Precisely, St, Anselm notes that God only exists as an idea, in that human beings cannot think of any other being that is greater than God (Geis 64). As a result of such imagination, St. Anselm concludes that God is the most Supreme Being since we cannot imagine anything else that is greater and mightier than God. In this paper, I will argue against of St. Anselm’s philosophical argument for the existence of God.