In an action for the recovery of the amount paid to Fast Food, there are various warranty theories that Jane and David can apply. The first of these theories is the implied warranty of merchantability. In this case, the two can rely on the condition that posits that the food or drink sold must fit the ordinary purposes for which it is sold. In this case, the buns fail to meet this criterion because they are not in a suitable condition for making the hot dogs. The second warranty that Jane and David may rely on is the implied warranty of fitness for a specific purpose. Since the purchase of the buns is intended for making hotdogs, they must be in such a state as to make this possible. In this case, the buns are moldy hence unfit for the purpose.
