MIS605_Assessment 1_Brief_Written Assessment Page 1 of 5Task SummaryIn response to the case study provided, identify the functional and the non-functional requirement forthe required information system and then build a Use Case Diagram and document set of use cases.ContextSystem analysis methods and skills are of fundamental importance for a Business Analyst. Thisassessment allows you to enhance your system analysis skills by capturing the business and thenfunctional and non-functional requirement of a system. It helps you in identifying “what” the proposedsystem will do and “how”?. ASSESSMENT 1 BRIEFSubject Code and TitleMIS605 Systems Analysis and DesignAssessmentWritten assessmentIndividual/GroupIndividualLength2000 words +/ 10%Learning OutcomesThe Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successfulcompletion of the task below include:a) Identify, critically evaluate and recommend informationsystems solutions for inefficiencies in business processes,procedures and work practices using data and processmodelling techniques.b) Formulate, validate and document business requirementsfor a medium-scale information system developmentproject and effectively communicate these requirements tothe stakeholders.c) Demonstrate the ability to effectively analyse, design anddevelop information systems using Unified ModellingLanguage (UML) models.SubmissionDue by 11:55pm AEST Sunday end of Module 3.1Weighting30%Total Marks100 marks MIS605_Assessment 1_Brief_Written Assessment Page 2 of 5Instructions1. Please read the attached MIS605_ Assessment 1_Case Study. Note that every piece ofinformation provided in the following case serves a purpose.2. Once you have completed reading the case study. Please answer the following questions:Question 1 (10 mark).Identify all the human and non-human actors within the system. Provide brief description againstevery actor.Question 2 (30 marks).Using the information provided in the case study, build a Use Case Diagram using any diagrammingsoftware.Note: Please make assumptions where needed.Question 3 (60 marks).Document all use cases (use case methods). All use cases identified in the Use Case Diagram inQuestion 2 must be elaborated in detail. Please document each use case using the following template: Use Case NumberUse Case TypeBase/Abstract (Extends or Includes)Use Case NamePriorityActor InvolvedAssociated DataSourcesAssociated UserInterfacesPre-Condition(s)Post Condition(s)DetailedDescription MIS605_Assessment 1_Brief_Written Assessment Page 3 of 5 Normal Courseof Events Using aFlow ChartDiagramAlternateCourse(s) Word Count and Layout The total word count for the written assessment should be no more than 2000 words. Please provide all your answers in a MS word document. Please note that you are NOT required to copy the questions over to the MS Word document.Use the question number to indicate which question your answer relates to. The recommended font size is 12 with 1.5 spacing.ReferencingIt is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing if needed. Please seemore information on referencing here http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencingSubmission InstructionsPlease submit the written assessment via the Assessment link within Assessment 1. The LearningFacilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed inMy Grades.MIS605_Assessment 1_Brief_written Assessment Page 4 of 5 Marking CriteriaFPCDHDQuestion 1: Identify all the humanand non-human actors within thesystem. Provide brief descriptionagainst every actor.10%Actors identified arelargely incorrect.Actors identified arepartially incorrect.Actors identified arecorrect but sufficientdetail is not provided.Actors identified arecorrect and sufficientdetail is provided.Actors identified arecorrect and sufficientdetail is provided. Thestudent has clearunderstanding ofhuman and nonhuman actors.Question 2: Using the informationprovided in the case study, build aUse Case Diagram using anydiagramming software.30%UCD does not includemajor use cases, manyactors in the UCD aremissing, association ofbase and abstractactors is not givenwith the use cases,extends and includesare not identifiedwhere required andnot linked to base usecase. The use casediagram does not syncin well with therequirements laiddown in the casestudy.UCD misses someimportant use cases,some actors in theUCD are missing, someassociations of baseand abstract actorsare not given with theuse cases, extends andincludes are partiallyidentified (whererequired). Extends andincludes and notappropriately linked tothe base use cases.The use case diagramdoes not fully syncwith the requirementslaid down in the casestudy.UCD has all the usecases and actors,some associations ofbase and abstractactors are not givenwith the use cases,extends and includesare partially identified(where required).Extends and includesare not appropriatelylinked to the base usecases. The use casediagram largely syncswith the requirementslaid down in the casestudy.UCD has all the usecases and actors,associations of baseand abstract actorsare given with the usecases, extends andincludes are identified(where required).Extends and includesand not appropriatelylinked to the base usecases. The use casediagram syncs incompletely with therequirements laiddown in the casestudy.UCD has all the usecases and actors,associations of baseand abstract actorsare given with the usecases, extends andincludes are identified(where required).Extends and includesand appropriatelylinked to the base usecases. The use casediagram syncs incompletely with therequirements laiddown in the casestudy. MIS605_Assessment 1_Brief_written Assessment Page 5 of 5 Marking CriteriaFPCDHDQuestion 3: Document all use cases(use case methods).60%Use case descriptionsare incomplete and donot sync in with thegiven case study.Use case descriptionsare partiallyincomplete and do notfully sync in with thegiven case study.Use case descriptionsare complete but donot fully sync in withthe given case study.Use case descriptionsare complete and arein sync in with thegiven case study.Use case descriptionsare complete, detailedand are in sync in withthe given case study.
