Medication management

Can I have 6 academic references such as researching articles /databases by using Medline,CINAHL complete , Cochrane library and 2 websites.
I need 200 words for question 1, 300 words for question2 ,
300 words for question 3 and 200 words for question 4 please.
To answer these questions, you need to refer to the case study.
Attached marking criteria.

Assessment Task 1: Professional Portfolio B. – Case Study: Medication management for a consumer Description: Students are to refer to the case study and answer the associated questions. The assignment is to be presented in a question/answer format, and not as an essay (i.e. no introduction or conclusion). Each answer must be supported with citations. Students must provide in-text referencing and a reference list must be provided at the end of the assignment. A minimum of (6) six academic references and (2) two websites are required for this assessment task Due date: 30/05/2016 Weighting: Ungraded PASS (PS)/FAIL (NN) Length and/or format: 1000 words Assessment criteria: Case study submission will be returned to students online via LEO. This assessment task will be graded against a standardised criterion referenced rubric. Please follow these criteria closely during the planning and development of your assignment. A minimum of (6) six academic references and (2) two websites are required for this assessment task Assessment Task 1: – Case Study: Medication management for a consumer Students are to respond to the following case study and provide a 1000 word medication management plan for Dylan Walz. Your plan will be based on the questions listed below. Please note: DO NOT seek out or use medication management plan templates from the web. The assignment is to be presented in a question /answer format,no dot points and not as an essay (i.e.no introduction or conclusion). Each answer must be supported with citations using APA referencing. You should follow the recommended formatting for academic papers. \Students must provide in-text referencing and a reference list (using APA referencing) must be provided at the end of the assignment.A minimum of six(6) academic references i.e. textbooks and journals and two(2) websites are required for this assignment. A marking guide has been made available in the unit outline to support your responses. Using the case study of Dylan (see below) please provide your written response to the following four (4) questions within your management plan. Question 1 (200 words) Provide a rationale for the medication (Olanzapine) prescribed for Dylan. Question 2 (300 words) Identify one (1) potential adverse effect and three (3) actual or potential major side effects of the medication prescribed for Dylan. Outline a nursing management strategy for each of the chosen adverse effect and side- effects you have described for Dylan. Question 3 ( 200 words) What are three (3) potential issues in relation to adherence for Dylan in the case study? How would therapeutic communication be used to assist with adherence of medication for Dylan? Question 4 (200 words) How is Dylan’s medication management influenced by recovery principles? CASE STUDY: Dylan Walz Family and social Dylan Walz is the third child of Jenny and Phil Walz. He has an older sister and brother, and twin younger brothers. He lives at home with his parents in a small studio/bedsit at the back of their house. His younger brothers left home 4 months ago to travel overseas, and his two older siblings live away from home. His older sister is married, and gave birth to twins twelve months ago. Dylan’s parents have been very busy with their first grandchildren. In the past 4 years Dylan has lost contact with many of his friends. He goes out with work mates for an occasional meal. He attends family activities sporadically and sometimes goes to the football with his father. He has not had an intimate relationship for the 4 years. Dylan’s mother Jenny, reports that she thinks her great Uncle John had schizophrenia. Her elderly mother only recently recalled this same information. Jenny reports that she was successfully treated for post -natal depression after the birth of her second child. Education and Work Dylan was educated at the local primary school and then attended the City Grammar School where he completed his final year of secondary schooling. He then enrolled in an engineering degree. However, he began to struggle with his studies in his third year and took a year of leave of absence. He has not returned to university study. He has worked at the local Coles store since he was 17 years of age. The store had been renovated over the past 18 months. This has caused disruption to all the staff, including Dylan. Past medical history Dylan has no significant medical problems and no significant developmental history. He broke his arm playing rugby at school and made a full recovery. Past psychiatric history Dylan had one brief episode in a psychiatric inpatient unit when he was 19. He was diagnosed at that time with a brief psychotic episode. He was treated with medication for a period of six months and then it was decided to reduce and cease his medication. Dylan’s parents believe that he may have used cannabis in early high school and again at University. For the past 4 years he has denied use of cannabis or any other substances. Current in patient admission Dylan has been an inpatient of the psychiatric unit for the past 3 weeks. His current provisional diagnosis is schizophrenia and he had been prescribed olanzapine 10mg BD. Dylan has refused to take olanzapine tablets. He reluctantly agrees to take a 10mg wafer. He says that the olanzapine gives him a dry mouth. Since his admission there has been evidence of weight gain. Although manageable, it has been noted by staff. Dylan has also informed nursing staff that he feels drowsier and it is harder for him to wake in the morning. Current Mental State Examination Appearance and Behaviour Dylan: • Looks stated age of 26 .Average for height and weight. Dylan has gained 5 kg since admission. He only eats food from packets or tins. Dylan has been found eating biscuits and chips in his room of a night and has told night staff he is hungry. • Black hair, unkempt • Unshaven • Dressed appropriate to weather, slightly disheveled • Staff have noted that Dylan is sedated in the mornings and needs prompting to get out of bed and attend to his personal hygiene • Reluctant to be involved in conversation with intermittent eye contact • Guarded when interacting with staff • Difficult to establish rapport- suspicious of people he doesn’t know Mood: Dylan describes himself as feeling anxious and suspicious because ‘People are out to poison him’ . Affect: Dylan’s has a restricted affect . Speech: Dylan replies to questions are brief, with monosyllabic responses Thought- Form of thought: Dylan displays evidence of thought blocking during conversation Content of thought: Dylan denies any suicidal and homicidal thoughts. Dylan believes that his food is being poisoned. For the past 12 months, he has eaten food from cans and drinks only bottled water. He believes that the fresh food that he used to buy from Coles is being poisoned by unknown people in the shopping center where he works. He says he has heard ‘them’ talking about him when he sits outside for lunch. Perception: Dylan experiences auditory hallucinations. He reports he has heard the noises in the roof for several months. He also reports that he has heard voices for about 18 months. He is very guarded and reluctant to elaborate except to say the there are several voices. Some of the voices are saying ‘bad things will happen to him’ and ‘others are helping him to stay safe’. Cognition: Dylan is orientated to time, place and person. He is not able to maintain concentration throughout interview. No formal cognitive testing has been ordered at this time. Insight : Dylan has limited insight into his illness. He is finding it hard to believe that the noises are hallucinations. He says he ‘got better’ last time. Judgement: Dylan’s judgment is poor. He doesn’t believe he needs to take medication when he leaves the unit but he says he will because he doesn’t want to have an injection every month. He accepts that he may be case managed on discharge.

Assessment Task – Professional Portfolio A and B Marking Guide Elements (Weighting) Expected (HD) Standard Expected (D) Standard Expected (CR) Standard Expected (P) Standard Expected (F) Standard (No attempt made) Reasoning (20 marks) Student has -highlighted in detail all the relevant significant factors for this task – Explained and analysed the concepts and or issues and their importance . – Referred to relevant theory and literature to support their reasoning. – Consider different perspectiv es – (e.g. theorectica l or ethical) interrelatio n to the concepts and issues. Student has: – highlighted in detail all the relevant significant factors for this task – Explained and analysed the concepts and or issues and their importance . – Referred to relevant theory and literature to support their reasoning. Student has: – highlighted most of the relevant significant factors for this task. – Explained and analysed the concepts and or issues and their importance on most occasions. Student has: – highlighted some relevant significant factors for this task. – Limited for explanatio n and analyses of the concepts and or issues. Student has: – highlighte d minimal significant factors for this task. – Little explanatio n and analysis of the concepts and or issues. Student has: – no significant factors for this task. – no explanation and analysis of concepts and or issues. Reflection (20 marks) – Critically reflected on the main points for discussion and elaborated on what might work and why (hypothesi sed possible outcomes). – Made use of reflection and integrated all aspects of reflection into the discussion integration and reflection. – Used mental health terminolog y throughout the discussion and within context. – Emphasised the importance of consumer perspectives throughout the discussion. – Made use of reflection and integrated most aspects of reflection into the discussion. Integration and reflection. – Used mental health terminolog y throughout most of the discussion and within context. – Emphasise d the importance of consumer perspectiv es throughout most the discussion and within context. – Emphasise d the importance of consumer perspectiv es throughout most of the discussion. – Made use of reflection and integrated most aspects of reflection into the discussion. – Used mental health terminology throughout most of the discussion and within context. – Emphasise d the importance of consumer perspectiv es throughout most the discussion and within context. – Emphasise d the importance of consumer perspectiv es throughout some of the discussion. – Limited use of reflection ad minima integration of reflection into the discussion. – Minimal use of mental health terminolog y and within context. – Some emphasis on the importance of consumer perspectiv e throughout the discussion. No evidence of the use reflection Little use of mental health terminology and not used within context. No emphasis of consumer perspective. – No use of reflection – No use of mental health terminology – No emphasis on consumer perspective s Sources and Referencing (5 marks) Credible and relevant relevant references are used. Accurate use of APA referencing style on most occasions. Accurate use of intent citations. Credible and relevant references are used. Accurate use of APA referencing style on most occasions. Mostly accurate use of intent citations. Credible and relevant references are used. Accurate use of APA referencing style on most occasions. – Most references are credible and relevant. Accurate use of APA referencing style on most occasions. Accurate use of in-text citations on most occasions. – Not all references are credible and/or relevant. Many inaccuracies with the APA referencing style. Too many direct quotations – There are no references used. Sentence and Paragraph Structure/ Intelligibility (2.5 marks) – The writing is organised into paragraphs, and the information is organised appropriately within the paragraph. Each paragraph relates to a discrete idea. There are clear linking sentences that link each paragraph to the next. – The writing is organised into paragraphs, and the information is mostly organised appropriately within the paragraph. Most paragraphs relates to a discrete idea. There are clear linking sentences that link most paragraphs to the next. – The writing is organised into paragraphs, and the information is mostly organised appropriately within the paragraph. Most paragraphs relates to a discrete idea. The paragraphs mostly link to one another. – The writing is organised into paragraphs, and the information is mostly organised appropriately within the paragraph. Most paragraphs relates to a discrete idea. – The writing is organised into paragraphs, and the information is mostly organised appropriately within the paragraph. However, most paragraphs don’t relate to a discrete idea, or link to one another. – There is no evidence of paragraphs. Mechanics: Grammar, Spelling and Punctuation (2.5 marks) – There are no errors with grammar, spelling and punctuation that impact readability, and the meaning is easily discernible. – There are minimal errors with grammar, spelling and punctuation that impact readability, and the meaning is easily discernible. – There are some errors with grammar, spelling and punctuation that impact readability. However, the meaning is readily discernible. – There are substantial errors with grammar, spelling and punctuation that impact readability. The errors detract significantly, but the meaning is discernible. – There are substantial errors with grammar, spelling and punctuation that impact readability. The errors detract significantly, but the meaning is discernible with some effort. – Grammar, spelling and punctuation are such that the reader cannot make sense of the content.