Finance Reportby Andreea DiaconuSubmission date: 16-May-2019 01:26PM (UTC+0100)Submission ID: 107386479File name: 105406_Andreea_Diaconu_Finance_Report_637805_1773608290.docx (56.71K)Word count: 2664Character count: 15274Similarity is quite highSee matrix for feedback. Marks subject toAssessment Board decisions.Excellent structure Awk. QMFINAL GRADE73/100Finance ReportGRADEMARK REPORTGENERAL COMMENTSInstructorPAGE 1Text Comment. Similarity is quite highText Comment. See matrix f or f eedback. Marks subject to Assessment Board decisions.PAGE 2Text Comment. Excellent structureText Comment. Excellent structurePAGE 3PAGE 4PAGE 5PAGE 6PAGE 7PAGE 8PAGE 9Awk.Awkward:The expression or construction is cumbersome or dif f icult to read. Consider rewriting.PAGE 10PAGE 11PAGE 12PAGE 13PAGE 14PAGE 15PAGE 16PAGE 17RUBRIC: BMP3005INTRODUCTIONEXCELLENT 80%+(10)EXCELLENT(7.50)VERY GOOD(6.50)GOOD(5.50)SATISFACTORY(4.50)NEEDS SOMEDEVELOPMENT(3.50)MUCH MOREDEVELOPMENT(2)FINANCIAL STAEXCELLENT 80%+(20)EXCELLENT(15)VERY GOOD(13)GOOD(11)73 / 1006.50 / 10Def ine and discuss the concept and importance of f inancial managementDirectly relevant attempt to address the learning outcomes covering all key issues insuf f iciently meaningf ul detail. A clearly def ined and comprehensive introductionDirectly relevant attempt to address the learning outcomes covering all key issues insuf f iciently meaningf ul detail. A clearly def ined and comprehensive introduction.A very good attempt to address the learning outcomes covering nearly all key issuesin suf f iciently meaningf ul detail. A very good attempt to deliver a clearly def ined andcomprehensive introductionA good attempt to address the learning outcomes covering key issues in some detail.A good attempt to deliver a clearly def ined and comprehensive introduction .A satisf actory attempt to address the learning outcomes covering key issues in somedetail. A satisf actory attempt to deliver a clearly def ined and comprehensiveintroduction.Some signif icant degree of irrelevance in the attempt to attempt to deliver a clearlydef ined and comprehensive introduction.A clearly under developed attempt to deliver a clearly def ined and comprehensiveintroduction.15 / 20Describe and discuss the main f inancial statements and explain the use of ratios in f inancial management.Directly relevant attempt to address the learning outcomes covering all key issues insuf f iciently meaningf ul detail. Demonstrates a comprehensive understanding andsubject knowledge with clear articulation and a logical structure, creating a generallysound level of overall coherence and progression with clear, logical conclusions.Directly relevant attempt to address the learning outcomes covering all key issues insuf f iciently meaningf ul detail. Demonstrates a comprehensive understanding andsubject knowledge with clear articulation and a logical structure, creating a generallysound level of overall coherence and progression with clear, logical conclusions.A highly relevant attempt to address the learning outcomes covering most key issuesin very good detail. Demonstrates a very good understanding and subject knowledgewith an adequate articulation and a logical structure, creating a basic level of overallcoherence and progression. Clear, logical conclusions.A good attempt to address the learning outcomes covering issues in basic detail withsome irrelevances. Demonstrates a basic understanding and subject knowledge butlacking clear f ocus and consistency in places. Conclusions are f airly clear and logical.SATISFACTORY(9)NEEDS SOMEDEVELOPMENT(7)MUCH MOREDEVELOPMENT(4)TEMPLATES EXPEXCELLENT 80%+(30)EXCELLENT(22.50)VERY GOOD(20.50)GOOD(16.50)SATISFACTORY(13.50)There is an adequate attempt at articulation although there are some gaps in overallcoherence and progression.A satisf actory attempt to address the learning outcomes covering issues in basicdetail with notable irrelevances. Demonstrates limited understanding and subjectknowledge where a basic argument is evident which lacks clarity and coherence.Issues are only vaguely stated. Conclusions are not always clear or logical. There issome attempt at articulation although there are signif icant gaps in overall coherenceand progression.Some signif icant degree of irrelevance in the attempt to address the learningoutcomes Demonstrates weaknesses in understanding and subject knowledge whereevidence of understanding of key issues is lacking. Conclusions are neither clear norlogical. Poorly structured. Lack of articulation. Format def icient.A clearly under developed attempt with a signif icant degree of irrelevance in theattempt to address the learning outcomes Demonstrates a lack of basic knowledgeof either theory or practice f or this level, with little evidence of understanding. Noattempt at argument or analysis. Conclusions are sparse. Unstructured. Lack ofarticulation. Format def icient.22.50 / 30Complete the Inf ormation on the ‘Business Review Template (Ensure that you display your calculations f orthis detail). ii. Using Excel produce an Income Statement f or the Sample Organisation (see Case Study).This should be included within your appendices. iii. Using Excel complete the Balance Sheet iv. Using theCase study inf ormation describe the prof itability, liquidity and ef f iciency of the company based on theresults of ratio analysis.Directly relevant attempt to address the learning outcomes covering all key issues insuf f iciently meaningf ul detail. Demonstrates a comprehensive understanding andsubject knowledge with clear articulation and a logical structure, creating a generallysound level of overall coherence and progression with clear, logical conclusions.Directly relevant attempt to address the learning outcomes covering all key issues insuf f iciently meaningf ul detail. Demonstrates a comprehensive understanding andsubject knowledge with clear articulation and a logical structure, creating a generallysound level of overall coherence and progression with clear, logical conclusions.A highly relevant attempt to address the learning outcomes covering most key issuesin very good detail. Demonstrates a very good understanding and subject knowledgewith an adequate articulation and a logical structure, creating a basic level of overallcoherence and progression.A good attempt to address the learning outcomes covering issues in basic detail withsome irrelevances. Demonstrates a basic understanding and subject knowledge butlacking clear f ocus and consistency in places. Conclusions are f airly clear and logical.There is an adequate attempt at articulation although there are some gaps in overallcoherence and progression.A satisf actory attempt to address the learning outcomes covering issues in basicdetail with notable irrelevances. Demonstrates limited understanding and subjectNEEDS SOMEDEVELOPMENT(10.50)MUCH MOREDEVELOPMENT(6)GRAMMAR/CITEEXCELLENT 80%+(10)EXCELLENT(7.50)VERY GOOD(6.50)GOOD(5.50)SATISFACTORY(4.50)NEEDS SOMEDEVELOPMENT(3.50)MUCH MOREDEVELOPMENT(2)knowledge where a basic argument is evident which lacks clarity and coherence.Issues are only vaguely stated. Conclusions are not always clear or logical. There issome attempt at articulation although there are signif icant gaps in overall coherenceand progression.Some signif icant degree of irrelevance in the attempt to address the learningoutcomes Demonstrates weaknesses in understanding and subject knowledge whereevidence of understanding of key issues is lacking. Conclusions are neither clear norlogical. Poorly structured. Lack of articulation. Format def icient.A clearly under developed attempt with a signif icant degree of irrelevance in theattempt to address the learning outcomes Demonstrates a lack of basic knowledgeof either theory or practice f or this level, with little evidence of understanding. Noattempt at argument or analysis. Conclusions are sparse. Unstructured. Lack ofarticulation. Format def icient.6.50 / 10Your report should be written using proper English grammar and should be ref erenced appropriately. Eachref erence cited in the report must appear in the ref erence list at the end.A very well written answer with standard spelling and grammar. Style is clear andregister is academic. A wide range of sources drawn upon. Most sources accuratelycited in the text and in the ref erence list.A very well written answer with standard spelling and grammar. Style is clear andregister is academic. A wide range of sources drawn upon. Most sources accuratelycited in the text and in the ref erence list.Well written with standard spelling and grammar. Style is clear and register generallyacademic A range of sources drawn upon. Most sources accurately cited in the text.Competently written with minor lapses in spelling and grammar. Style is readable and aclear attempt has been made to use academic register. Relevant sources cited. Someweaknesses in ref erencing technique.Generally competent writing although intermittent lapses in grammar and spellingpose obstacles f or the reader. Register needs to be more academic in places.Generally satisf actory attempt at in text ref erencing with some lack of academicsources and errors in ref erencing technique.Def iciencies in spelling and grammar make reading dif f icult. Style impairs clarity.Register needs to be more academic. Def iciencies are exhibited in this attempt at intext ref erencing with a lack of academic sources and clear errors in ref erencingtechnique. Limited sources and poor ref erencingPoorly written with numerous def iciencies in grammar, spelling, expression and style.Style impairs clarity. Register is not academic. Clear def iciencies are exhibited in thisattempt at in text ref erencing with an absence of academic sources and in textref erences. Where used citations show clear errors in ref erencing technique. Limitedsources and poor ref erencingANALYSISEXCELLENT 80%+(30)EXCELLENT(22.50)VERY GOOD(20.50)GOOD(16.50)SATISFACTORY(13.50)NEEDS SOMEDEVELOPMENT(10.50)MUCH MOREDEVELOPMENT(6)22.50 / 30Using examples f rom the case study describe and discuss the processes this business might use toimprove their f inancial perf ormanceProvides a generally coherent analysis which demonstrates independent thinking.Generally provides clear f ocus and consistency. Evidence of analysis, although workis sometimes descriptive or narrative. Conclusions are clear and logical.Provides a generally coherent analysis which demonstrates independent thinking.Generally provides clear f ocus and consistency. Evidence of analysis, although workis sometimes descriptive or narrative. Conclusions are clear and logical.Provides a generally coherent analysis, but sometimes lacking clear f ocus andconsistency. Evidence of analysis, although some passages descriptive or narrative.Conclusions are f airly clear and logical.Analysis is attempted but sometimes lacks clarity and coherence. Issues generallypresented with clarity. Some attempt at analysis but large passages descriptive ornarrative. Conclusions are f airly clear and logical.An analytical argument is attempted but overall lacks clarity and coherence. Issues areonly vaguely stated. Some attempt at analysis but work largely descriptive ornarrative. Conclusions are not always clear or logical.Very limited attempt at analysis and work is almost entirely descriptive or narrative instyle.. Conclusions are neither clear nor logical.No or a wholly underdeveloped attempt at analysis. Conclusions are sparse.
