This paper looks into certain situations in the society where sound judgments and decisions are needed to come at a better solution to an ethical dilemma.
The ethical dilemma is a compound situation often involving apparent mental conflicts between moral imperatives where a party would be relatively disobeyed when the other party is deliberately adhered to. This is often called as the ethical paradoxes in moral philosophy and is more often than not brought into play in attempting to refute a particular ethical system or moral code (“What is an Ethical Dilemma,” 2012). Also, morals are of significant in the Criminal Justice field today. On the off chance that the police power excused the dishonest conduct, there would be practically equity being served. Authority police offense is any “frightful moves made by cops regarding their official obligations, which can prompt a premature delivery of capital”. Be that as it may, “police wrongdoing may incorporate a more extensive scope of unfortunate behavior, mirroring the exclusive expectations that we expect of cops. Not at all like adverse authority action, police wrongdoing can apply to the on holiday conduct and also direct at work. Morals are applicable in an investigation because if the power supported exploitative practices, there would be practically nothing if any, equity being served. We will now concentrate on some situations questioning moral issues and perceive how these conditions can affect a case.
This research does not only delve into peer-reviewed resources but also acquires information based on the researcher’s point of view. It reflects the researcher’s ethical behavior towards certain situations that might come along the way in the future.This research focuses on the appropriate courses of action to be done in an individual case. It discussed the moral or ethical objective for the decisions made by the people concerned. It also identifies the proper decisions that the doer of the action should make. It also gives the motives of the doer of the action, the consequences of the both options, and the ethical bases for the doer’s decision towards the situation. (De Amicis, 2005)
