t4339Ler Question Guide (2) (6).docx Beck (2020)Module 6: Assignment – Qualitative Research CritiquePage < > of 6Method-Protection of Human Rights: – Was the study approved and monitored by an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Research Ethics Board (REB), or other similar ethics review committee? Explain. – Were participants subjected to any physical halm, discomfort, or psychological distress? Did the researchers take appropriate steps to remove, prevent, or minimize harm? Explain. -Was the study designed to minimize risks and maximize benefits? Did the benefits to participants outweigh any potential risks or actual discomfort they experienced? Did the benefits to society outweigh the costs to participants? Explain. -Was any type of coercion or undue influence used to recruit participants? Did they have the right to refuse to participate or to withdraw without penalty? Explain. -Were participants deceived in any way? Were they fully aware of participating in a study and did they understand the purpose and nature of the research? Explain. -Were appropriate informed consent procedures used? If not, were there valid and justifiable reasons? Explain. -Were adequate steps taken to safeguard participants’ privacy? How was confidentiality maintained? Were Privacy Rule procedures followed (if applicable)? Was a Certificate of Confidentiality obtained? If not. should one have been obtained? Explain. -Were villnerable e7rnnnc in•nl•erltique Grading Rubric is provided below. rjorfaculty writingofthis :students do not write to ore the following: a III3in the recenreb9 ff v, were ,nevill tweequitinn, liced heenticeformal p_opercissignment. Students do not include the lost 4 criteriain their paper.COMpunR HELP 1-800-894-5705 466
